I have a love-hate relationship with voice-over films and television. As much as I love to listen to good voice-over musings, I hate that actions are not enough to express deep thoughts.
This is what voice-overs do to me. They get me thinking. Sometimes, almost make me ponder unnecessarily, endlessly. Always about more than one thing. Today’s film got me hooked onto relationships. In general. Nothing specific. I’ve always been satisfied with all my alliances and all the joy and pain that they bring. I’m not that special and once in a while I do think that the grass is greener on the other side. I used to see “perfect” couples and think, “Wow, I want to have something like that!”, or, “I want to grow up to be like them”. As I got better acquainted and analysed their relations closer, I thought otherwise. I did not want to be “like” any one of those couples. Then I went ahead and became a couple with the H and I adore what we have. I realized, probably one of the most important lessons, that it’s not about seeing the greener side. It’s about making your side greener (It is always good to know what you don’t want on your greens). Or maybe it’s as simple as this; there is no such thing as greener grass. Grass is green. Period.
The most complicated thing in relations is defining them. Sometimes the names that we give relations is not enough to effectively communicate exactly what you might share with that person. Is saying “friend” or “sister” or “husband” or even ” mother” enough of a word (?) to say everything about what the relationship encompasses? My mother is much, much more than motherly concern and affection. Some friends are more than family, some are plain acquaintances. The H fills in so many other positions in terms of relations than just a husband. This business of definitions actually ruins the pure essence of relations. This world being a big, nasty place, it becomes important to name all people within the parameters of these relationships. The world cares a hoot about your definitions of these names, it is happy as long as it gets a name. That’s the world’s fetish, that’s how we have phrases like, “like my brother” or “like my sister” (I would love to meet someone who uses, “like my husband” or “like my wife”
, that would be interesting, eh?
). Most importantly though, it suffices that you (alone) get these, definitions, or names or not, because muddling relations in the name of names is the easiest thing. Giving names to relations is the beginning of serious involvement as well as a convenient escape to avoid deeper personal involvemet. So what matters to me, is not the names, but the associations and affections that I relate to the individuals.
Bottom line, I love people for their individuality and contribution to my life (selfish, I know), than what name they bring to the equation.
Posted in Random, Relationships